Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Legacy Knight Strategic Opportunites Fund-Parallel Series v. Wrigley Jr. et al
as 9:2022cv81569
Plaintiff:
Legacy Knight Strategic Opportunites Fund-Parallel Series
Defendant:
William Beau Wrigley Jr., James Whitcomb, SH Parent Inc. doing business as Parallel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Forrest et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00814
Plaintiff:
Forrest, Vicky Forrest, Kathy Foster and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
TradeInvest Asset Management Company (BVI) Ltd. et al v. Wrigley Jr. et al
as 9:2022cv80360
Plaintiff:
TradeInvest Asset Management Company (BVI) Ltd., First Ocean Enterprises SA and Techview Investments Ltd.
Defendant:
William "Beau" Wrigley Jr., James Holmes, James Whitcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Holmes v. QLink Wireless, LLC
as 0:2022cv60106
Plaintiff:
Henry James Holmes
Defendant:
QLink Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
USA v. Jon Stoune
as 19-14585
Defendant / Appellant:
JON CHRISTOPHER STOUNE, a.k.a. Mycroft James Holmes
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Henry Holmes v. People of the State of CA
as 19-55829
Petitioner / Appellant:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Respondent / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Lucy Sidberry v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 19-1375
Plaintiff:
GERTIE JACOBS, LEOLA JACOBS, LENORA NICHOLSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MURPHY-BROWN, LLC and MURPHY-BROWN, LLC, d/b/a Smithfield Hog Production Division
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES JACOBS, LUCY SIDBERRY, JOYCE MESSICK and others
USA v. Jon Stoune
as 19-10538
Defendant / Appellant:
JON CHRISTOPHER STOUNE, a.k.a. Mycroft James Holmes
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Henry Holmes v. David Davey
as 17-72092
Petitioner:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Respondent:
DAVID DAVEY, Warden
Henry Holmes v. State of California
as 16-73307
Petitioner:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Respondent:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
