Cases 1 - 7 of 7
James Colvin v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 19-30888
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANDI LEFEAUX, Corrections Specialist, CAROLYN WADE, Records Clerk, ROBERT TANNER, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. COLVIN
Ronald Marshall v. Bobby Jindal, et al
as 14-31375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY JINDAL, Governor of State, JAMES LEBLANC, Secretary of Corrections and ROBERT TANNER, Warden
Mark Walker v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 14-30897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES LEBLANC, Secretary of Corrections, both personal and professional capacities and TRISH FOSTER, Legal Programs at Angola, both personal and professional capacities
Larry Lewis v. Bobby Jindal, et al
as 14-30770
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY JINDAL, Governor of State; sued in official and individual capacity, JAMES LEBLANC, Secretary of Corrections; sued in his official and individual capacity and ROBERT TANNER, CCE, Warden; sued in his official and individual capacity
Joseph Smith v. Bobby Jindal, et al
as 14-30502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH I. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY JINDAL, Governor of State, sued in his official and indiviual capacities, JAMES LEBLANC, Secretary of Corrections, sued in his official and indiviual capacities and ROBERT TANNER, CCE, Warden, sued in his official and indiviual capacities
Lawrence Marrero v. Bobby Jindal, et al
as 14-30493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE MARRERO
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY JINDAL, Governor of State; sued in his official and individual capacity, JAMES LEBLANC, Secretary of Corrections; sued in his official and individual capacity and ROBERT TANNER, CCE, Warden; sued in his official and individual capacity
Carey Hood v. Samantha Angelle, et al
as 10-30649
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAREY LOUIS HOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
N BURL CAIN and JAMES LEBLANC, Secretary of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
