Cases 1 - 5 of 5
McKinney v. The Cheesecake Factory Restaurants, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03116
Plaintiff:
James McKinney
Defendant:
The Cheesecake Factory Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Trustees of the Construction I, et al v. Sheryl Archie, et al
as 14-16034
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST, TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS JOINT PENSION TRUST, TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS VACATION TRUST and others
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
SHERYL ARCHIE, an individual and JAMES MCKINNEY, an individual
Flatford et al v. International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 663 et al
as 2:2013cv14243
Plaintiff:
Isarel Flatford , Jennifer Abel , Franklin Anderson and others
Defendant:
International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 663, International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184
Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust et al v. Sheryl Archie et al
as 2:2012cv00225
Defendant:
James McKinney and Sheryl Archie
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust, Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust, Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Vacation Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Roberts et al v. Atlanta Office Movers, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00840
Plaintiff:
Donald Roberts, Donald Roberts, Mark Brown and others
Defendant:
Atlanta Office Movers, Inc. and James McKinney, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
