Cases 1 - 10 of 15
James Douglas v. Margaret Gilbert
as 18-35569
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES PHILIP DOUGLAS
Respondent - Appellee:
MARGARET GILBERT, Superintendent
Douglas v. Gilbert
as 3:2016cv06060
Petitioner:
James Philip Douglas
Respondent:
Margaret Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Douglas v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv05507
Plaintiff:
James Philip Douglas
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, WA State Attorney General's Office, Unknowns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Douglas v. Martha Karr
as 10-36089
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES PHILIP DOUGLAS
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTHA KARR
James Douglas v. United States District Court f
as 10-72352
:
In re: JAMES PHILIP DOUGLAS
Petitioner:
JAMES PHILIP DOUGLAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, TACOMA
Real Party In Interest:
ROBERT MASKO
James Douglas v. Ron Van Boening, et al
as 09-36102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES PHILIP DOUGLAS
Defendant - Appellee:
RON VAN BOENING, Superintendent MICC, CYNTHIA BAKER, Medical Manager and WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
James Douglas v. Pierce County, et al
as 09-36024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES PHILIP DOUGLAS
Defendant - Appellee:
PIERCE COUNTY, JOHN LADENBURG, DEPARTMENT OF ASSIGNED COUNSEL and others
James Douglas v. Bryan Chushcoff, et al
as 09-36023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES PHILIP DOUGLAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN CHUSHCOFF, Judge, LISA WORSICK, Judge and PAT MCCARTHY, Pierce County Executive
Douglas v. McCarthy et al
as 3:2009cv05631
Plaintiff:
James Philip Douglas
Defendant:
Pat McCarthy, John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Chushcoff et al
as 3:2009cv05490
Petitioner:
James Philip Douglas
Respondent:
Bryan Chushcoff, Lisa Worswick and Pat McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
