Cases 31 - 40 of 171
Melton v. State Of Florida et al
as 1:2007cv23046
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Melton
Respondent:
State Of Florida, Attorney General of the State of Florida and James R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davorn v. Crosby et al
as 3:2007cv01056
Plaintiff:
Davis Julius Davorn
Defendant:
James V Crosby, James R. McDonough, Pilar Tournau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICELI v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 4:2007cv00480
Plaintiff:
CHARLES N MICELI
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH, WILLIAM BUCHTMANN, MR WELLHAUSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ragoobar v. McDonough
as 0:2007cv61625
Plaintiff:
Edward Ragoobar
Defendant:
James R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Crist et al
as 3:2007cv01049
Plaintiff:
Zachary D. Green
Defendant:
Charlie Crist, James R. McDonough, Randall Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEACHUM v. MCDONOUGH
as 5:2007cv00266
Petitioner:
CEDRICK M BEACHUM
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 4:2007cv00469
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH, RICHARD SCHLAF, J LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FETZER v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2007cv00464
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FETZER
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. MCDONOUGH
as 3:2007cv00469
Petitioner:
KENNETH C ANDERSON
Respondent:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LITTLE v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2007cv00464
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JEROME LITTLE
Defendant:
D ELLIS, WILSON, GUNNER DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
