Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 62
State Water Contractors v. Locke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01378
Defendant: Gary Locke, United States Department of Commerce, James W. Balsiger and others
Plaintiff: State Water Contractors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Type: Other Statutes None
State Water Contractors v. Locke et al
as 1:2009at00618
Defendant: Gary Locke, United States Department of Commerce, James W. Balsiger and others
Plaintiff: State Water Contractors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Type: Other Statutes None
United Boatmen of New York, Inc. et al v. Locke et al
as 1:2009cv03202
Plaintiff: United Boatmen of New York, Inc., New York Fishing Tackle Trade Associaton, Inc. and Fishermen's Conservation Association
Defendant: Gary Locke, United States Department of Commerce, Jane Lubchenco and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Type: Other Statutes None
The State of New York et al v. Locke et al
as 1:2009cv03196
Plaintiff: The State of New York, Alexander B. Grannis and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Defendant: Gary Locke, United States Department of Commerce, Jane Lubchenco and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Type: Other Statutes None
Stockton East Water District v. United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01090
Plaintiff: Stockton East Water District, Stockton East Water District, Stockton East Water District and others
Defendant: United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Department of Commerce and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Type: Other Statutes None
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Locke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01053
Plaintiff: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and others
Defendant: Gary F. Locke, United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Locke et al
as 1:2009at00462
Plaintiff: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and others
Defendant: Gary F. Locke, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Type: Other Statutes None
La Jolla Friends of the Seals, et al v. NOAA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-55828
Plaintiff - Appellant: LA JOLLA FRIENDS OF THE SEALS, a nonprofit organization and JAMES H.N. HUDNALL, Jr., an individual
Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION'S NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Dept. of Commerce, OTTO J. WOLFF, Acting Secretary of Commerce, JAMES W. BALSIGER, Acting Director of NMFS and others
VAN VALIN et al v. LOCKE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00961
Plaintiff: SCOTT VAN VALIN, KEN DOLE, RICK BIERMAN and others
Defendant: GARY LOCKE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, JANE LUBCHENCO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Type: Other Statutes None
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. LOCKE et al
as 1:2009cv00099
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC and others
Defendant: GARY LOCKE, JAMES W BALSIGER and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?