Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WARREN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11612
Plaintiff:
JAMES WARREN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WARREN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20857
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES WARREN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CORNELIUS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55420
Plaintiff:
JAMES WARREN CORNELIUS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARREN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv03385
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AARON JAMES WARREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv70313
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES WARREN MARX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neary v. Global Gold Exchange LLC et al
as 1:2020cv21043
Defendant:
Richard M. Owen, Tobias Hallin, James Warren and others
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Neary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
WARREN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv21699
Plaintiff:
BRANDEN JAMES WARREN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIAL v. TYNDALL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 5:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
DEBORA C DIAL
Defendant:
JAMES WARREN and TYNDALL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Menefee v. Japanese Garden Mobile Estates, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv03106
Plaintiff:
James Warren Menefee, Jr.
Defendant:
Japanese Garden Mobile Estates, Inc., Stephen Lyle and Barbara Zink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Hinson v. Warren et al
as 2:2017cv14018
Plaintiff:
Litita Hinson
Defendant:
James Warren and William Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
