Cases 1 - 10 of 351
DOE v. AUSTIN III et al
as 1:2024cv02143
Defendant:
CHRISTINE WORMUTH, ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS and LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
RUSSELL et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01820
Plaintiff:
LEANNE CHRISTINE REILLY, TIMOTHY R. BECK, ERIC N. CHRISTIAN, JR. and others
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-12, PAMELA A. SMITH, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
DiLELLA et al v. BURCHARD et al
as 1:2024cv01675
Defendant:
KERI POTTS, KIRSTI GARLOCK, JOHN AND JANE DOE(S) 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL M DILELLA and FRANK GIORDANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01821
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01863
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
RAY v. PRIVER et al
as 1:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
AMES RAY
Defendant:
DONALD PRIVER, JON LAWSON and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DOE v. CHRIST CHURCH GEORGETOWN et al
as 1:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
Christ Church Georgetown and Timothy Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
