Cases 31 - 40 of 42
IN RE WACHOVIA CORPORATION ERISA LITIGATION
as 1:2008cv05578
Plaintiff:
Denise A. Tuttle and Denise A. Tuttle
Defendant:
Wachovia Corporation, John D. Baker, II, Peter C. Browning and others
Movant:
Jason T. Willard and Michael Welch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
DELSTRITTA v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05385
Plaintiff:
JERRY DELSTRITTA
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Objector:
plc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAGAROZY v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05380
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BAGAROZY
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05382
Plaintiff:
FRANK SANCHEZ
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CONKRIGHT v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05390
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CONKRIGHT
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Objector:
plc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05378
Plaintiff:
WALTER HARRELL
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SALERNO v. JACK DOES 1-40, et al.
as 2:2007cv05391
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SALERNO
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAINES v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05387
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HAINES
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CREVELING v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05381
Plaintiff:
MARK CREVELING
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONN v. JACK DOES 1-40 et al
as 2:2007cv05393
Plaintiff:
TERRY CONN
Defendant:
JACK DOES 1-40 and JANE DOES 1-40
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
