Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Mendoza v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv02652
Defendant:
Corrections Does 1-10, Eric Holder, ICE and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mares v. United States et al
as 6:2013cv06187
Plaintiff:
Peter Mares
Defendant:
United States of America, The United States Custom and Border Protection, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Kim v. Obama et al
as 1:2013cv02298
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Jr., Secretary Janet Napolitano and Barack Obama
Plaintiff:
Washington Younggil Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01404
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Walia v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv05944
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Loretta E. Lynch and Janet Napolitano
Plaintiff:
Sunil Walia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05878
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Garcon v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2012cv08112
Plaintiff:
Guy Robert Garcon
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano and Dept. of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
