Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Lacey Sivak v. Jay Christensen
as 23-35453
Petitioner / Appellant:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent / Appellee:
JAY CHRISTENSEN, Warden
Stone v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Scott Stone
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Page et al
as 1:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jody Carr
Defendant:
Chad Page, Amanda Gentry, Jay Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willard v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Cody Willard
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacey Sivak v. Thomas, I.S.C.C. Security, et al
as 23-35278
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS, I.S.C.C. SECURITY, JAPHET, I.S.C.C. SECURITY, SGT. I.S.C.C. SECURITY BEARD and others
Payne v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Erik Jon Payne
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge David C. Nye, Judge B. Lynn Winmill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farley v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Casey Farley
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lincoln v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Joshuah Lincoln
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Dennis Peterson
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacey Sivak v. Jay Christensen
as 23-35099
Petitioner / Appellant:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent / Appellee:
JAY CHRISTENSEN, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
