Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
PULOTOV v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv06067
Plaintiff:
NEMAT PULOTOV
Defendant:
US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GOLDEN HEALTH SERVICES v. TD BANK et al
as 2:2016cv05929
Plaintiff:
GOLDEN HEALTH SERVICES
Defendant:
TD BANK, JEH JOHNSON and LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ZAYNUTDINOV v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv05596
Plaintiff:
AZAMJON ZAYNUTDINOV
Defendant:
US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, JEH JOHNSON and LEON RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
AHMEDOV v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv04976
Plaintiff:
ABDURASHID AHMEDOV
Defendant:
US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
AMPARO et al v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2016cv04121
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO JOEL ANTONIO AMPARO and EUNICE MERCEDES SALDANA
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, JEH JOHNSON, EVANGELIA KLAPAKIS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
