Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
EBIN NEW YORK, INC. v. KISS NAIL PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02369
Defendant:
YONG JIN CHANG, KISS NAIL PRODUCTS, INC. and JOHN CHANG
Plaintiff:
EBIN NEW YORK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
LEE v. CHO et al
as 2:2023cv02175
Plaintiff:
Kyongro LEE
Defendant:
SUK SAN CHO, KYUK KIM, SOOKIL JEON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
LEE v. CHO et al
as 1:2023cv02175
Plaintiff:
Kyongro LEE
Defendant:
SUK SAN CHO, KYUK KIM, SOOKIL JEON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
SHIN v. CHUNG SOL GARDEN CORP et al
as 2:2022cv05293
Plaintiff:
JIN HEE SHIN
Defendant:
CHUNG SOL GARDEN CORP, NAN I YI and CHUNG SOL GARDEN CORP doing business as CHUNG SOL BAT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MURPHY-DORSANEO v. JUNG et al
as 1:2022cv05100
Plaintiff:
DESTINY MURPHY-DORSANEO
Defendant:
JIN JUNG, M.D., ANITA BHAMIDIPATI, M.D., LARCHMONT MEDICAL IMAGINE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
PIAO et al v. MASS COATING INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02741
Plaintiff:
YUNHE PIAO, MINGZHE JIANG, SHANNON JIN and others
Defendant:
MASS COATING INC. and JAY SONG
JIN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON
as 3:2021cv19366
Plaintiff:
BAILAN JIN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
