Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Texas Alliance for Responsible Growth, Environment and Transportation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2015cv00322
Plaintiff:
Texas Alliance for Responsible Growth, Environment and Transportation
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Gina McCarthy, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
TX Alli for Responsible Growth v. EPA, et al
as 15-60795
Petitioner:
TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR RESPONSIBLE GROWTH, ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSPORTATION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Louisiana State v. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 15-30962
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LOUISIANA STATE, through the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Board and the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, RICHARD L. HANSEN, Colonel, in his official capacity as District Commander for the New Orleans District of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, MICHAEL C. WEHR, Major, in his official capacity as Commander for the Mississippi Valley Division of the United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Assoc of Amer Railroads, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-60698
Petitioner:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS and PORT TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Association Of American Railroads et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2015cv00266
Plaintiff:
Association Of American Railroads and Port Terminal Railroad Association
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency , Regina McCarthy , United States Army Corps Of Engineers and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Utility Water Act Group v. EPA, et al
as 15-60509
Petitioner:
UTILITY WATER ACT GROUP
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
American Farm Bureau Fed, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-60510
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, AMERICAN ROAD AND TRANSPORTATION BUILDERS ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-60492
Petitioner:
STATE OF TEXAS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Enviornmental Protection Agency, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
American Farm Bureau Federation et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
American Farm Bureau Federation , American Petroleum Institute , American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Regina McCarthy , U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Movant:
Eugene P Holmes and Penny Sisson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-60460
Petitioner:
STATE OF TEXAS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Enviornmental Protection Agency, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
