Cases 1 - 10 of 311
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bonilla et al v. Gerlach et al
as 5:2023cv01060
Defendant:
Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Board of County Commissioners of Grady County, Jim Gerlach and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Johnson v. Sasnett et al
as 5:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
Jamie Sasnett and JOHN DOE, 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gage v. Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center Trust et al
as 5:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
Russell Gage
Defendant:
Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center Trust, Breonna R Thompson, Bobby Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGill v. Ballard et al
as 4:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Samuel Curtis McGill, Jr
Defendant:
Matt Ballard, George Gibbs, Jr., Mary Leavell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duckworth v. Mooney et al
as 5:2023cv00679
Plaintiff:
Portia C Duckworth
Defendant:
FNU Mooney, FNU Stall, JOHN DOE, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Harwell et al
as 5:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Mitchell, III
Defendant:
Capt Scott Harwell, John Doe and Michael Klika
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
