Cases 1 - 10 of 604
Townsend v. Vaughn et al
as 3:2024cv01758
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Laresha D. Reed, Mr. Gouche and others
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Martinez et al
as 3:2024cv01762
Defendant:
Jefferson, Joshua Schoenbeck, John 1 Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Home Depot Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv08123
Defendant:
Home Depot Corporation, John Doe #2, Edward Ted Decker and others
Plaintiff:
Fred F Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Regan v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01693
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01740
Defendant:
John 1 Doe, Lt. Dudek, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Davila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentz v. Ball et al
as 3:2024cv03191
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
. Berry., John Doe #3 and #4, Brittany Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03169
Defendant:
John Doe 3, LaToya Hughes, John Doe 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Maza Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv01875
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Bantry Group Corporation, Treating General Practitioner and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Reid et al
as 3:2024cv01596
Plaintiff:
Jeryme Morgan
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Lt. Reid, Asst. Warden Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01679
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe 4, Latoya Hughes, Jane/John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob P. Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
