Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Waters v. Officer Calderon et al
as 0:2023cv61681
Plaintiff:
Vicki Waters, Brieanna Muldrew and Rian Muldrew
Defendant:
Officer Andrea Calderon, Officer Alejandro Escobar, Officer Amanda Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CABRAL v. EAST COAST BOBCAT SERVICE, INC.
as 0:2023cv60893
Plaintiff:
CHLOE CABRAL
Defendant:
EAST COAST BOBCAT SERVICE INC, a Florida Corporation, and John Does 1-5 doing business as East Coast Maintenance & Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
MYLES v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2021cv00087
Defendant:
MARK INCH, JOHN DOES 1-5, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNA MYLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv80532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv01456
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv01464
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv21812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Does, 1-5 v. Swearingen
as 1:2018cv24145
Plaintiff:
John Does, 1-5
Defendant:
Richard L. Swearingen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Galluzzi et al
as 6:2018cv00708
Plaintiff:
Alexzander Houston
Defendant:
Nicholas Galluzzi and "John Does" 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hembrock v. Universal Health Services, Inc., et al
as 3:2016cv01061
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hembrock
Defendant:
Universal Health Services, Inc. , Premier Behavioral Solutions, Inc. , TBJ Behavioral Center, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
