Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Holcomb v. Lucas County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2013cv00627
Plaintiff:
Kevin Holcomb
Defendant:
Lucas County Sheriff's Office , James A. Telb , Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Lucas County, et al
as 3:2012cv03103
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Robinson
Defendant:
Lucas County , James Telb , Milan Voska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaze v. Cuyahoga County Jail et al
as 1:2012cv03008
Plaintiff:
Cedric A. Glaze
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Jail, Warden Ivey, Keith Pipkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Cruse et al
as 2:2012cv00609
Plaintiff:
John Patrick Moore
Defendant:
Brent Cruse, 2nd Shift Yard Officer John Doe 1, 2nd Shift Yard Officer John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobo v. Clinton et al
as 1:2012cv00552
Plaintiff:
Victor Bobo
Defendant:
Warden Clinton, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Brunsman et al
as 1:2012cv00132
Plaintiff:
A.D. Armstrong
Defendant:
Tim Brunsman, Hinkole, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilder v. Doctor John Doe #1 et al
as 2:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Wilder
Defendant:
Doctor John Doe #1, Doctor Orbergon, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. McConnegly et al
as 1:2011cv01288
Plaintiff:
Dan J. Day
Defendant:
C.O. McConnegly, John Doe #1, C.O. Nauss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2011cv00874
Plaintiff:
David Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County, Kenneth Kochevar, Director of Cuyahoga County Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Facundo et al v. Morely et al
as 4:2009cv01623
Plaintiff:
Enrique Facundo and Mar D'Oro International Ltd.
Defendant:
J. Morely, Robert Johnson, Donald Habran and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
