Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Iraheta v. Doe (1) et al
as 4:2024cv01163
Plaintiff:
Jose D. Iraheta
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Doe 1 et al v. Al-Qaeda et al
as 3:2020cv00681
Plaintiff:
John Doe 3, John Doe 1, John Doe 7 and others
Defendant:
The Taliban, The Haqqani Network and Al-Qaeda
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Simmons v. John Doe 1 et al
as 3:2019cv00678
Defendant:
John Doe #4, Mr John Doe's, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Doe 1 et al
as 4:2018cv00807
Defendant:
John Doe 2 and John Doe 1
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Rossmann v. Duke et al
as 4:2017mc03124
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant:
Elaine Duke, Eric Patterson, Joseph Maher and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Talbert v. Livingston et al
as 4:2016mc01601
Plaintiff:
Otis D Talbert
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Sgt Jefferson, R M Grothen and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Everett et al v. Chemicals, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv03672
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Everett , Mike Kowis , Michael James Kowis and others
Defendant:
Tram Chemicals, Inc. , Walden Performance Products, Inc. , Maxcong LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Everett et al v. Tram Chemicals, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv03451
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Everett , Mike Kowis , Michael James Kowis and others
Defendant:
Tram Chemicals, Inc., Walden Environmental Chemistries, Inc., Walden Performance Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv02977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Meneses v. Alaniz et al
as 7:2015mc00319
Plaintiff:
Joel Cardenas Meneses
Defendant:
Anibal Alaniz, Eduardo Lozano, Gabriel Gaytan and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
