Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Garrison v. Doe
as 1:2023cv01410
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Garrison
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2023cv00750
Plaintiff:
Scott Peters
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Daniel Rodriguez, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Dukhan D. Flowers
Defendant:
Larimer County Detention Center, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winstead v. City of Colorado Springs et al
as 1:2022cv03233
Plaintiff:
James Winstead
Defendant:
City of Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs Police Dept., 705 South Nevada Ave Colorado Springs CO 80903 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKibben v. City of Fountain CO et al
as 1:2022cv03232
Plaintiff:
Troy McKibben
Defendant:
City of Fountain CO, Fountain Police Dept., John Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKibben v. City of Montrose Colorado et al
as 1:2022cv03229
Plaintiff:
Troy McKibben
Defendant:
City of Montrose Colorado, Montrose Police Department, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovato v. Little et al
as 1:2022cv02905
Plaintiff:
William B. Lovato
Defendant:
Thomas Little, David Lisac, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyer v. Carlson et al
as 1:2022cv02863
Plaintiff:
Brendan Dyer
Defendant:
Mary Carlson, Mary Buchanan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carr v. Doe
as 1:2022cv02419
Plaintiff:
Amy Carr
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez-Topete v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2022cv01713
Plaintiff:
Hugo Vazquez-Topete
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
