Cases 11 - 20 of 520
FAULKNER v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
DONNAIRE FAULKNER
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1 a/k/a XIANGMING CHEN, DEFENDANT 2 a/k/a MING CHEN, DEFENDANT 3 a/k/a YANG HAOYU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
AUSTRIA v. DEFENDANT 1 a/k/a Le et al
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
ALONA AUSTRIA
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1 a/k/a Le and JOHN DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC v. DOE
as 4:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
AHMED v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1, EVANGELINE BROWN and JOHN DOES 1-20
Plaintiff:
IMDAD AHMED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
THORNTON v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. THORNTON
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1 and JOHN DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
HOBBS v. CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
OLANDIS DEAN HOBBS
Defendant:
CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH, PANAMA CITY BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHEWS v. STREEIT et al
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
J STREEIT and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMBULINGHAM v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00116
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1, DEFENDANT 2, AMEAD and others
Plaintiff:
HEMANTHKUMAR JAMBULINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CHRISTOPHE v. SASSER et al
as 3:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHE ILMART and ILMART CHRISTOPHE
Defendant:
DR SASSER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SALEM v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Defendant:
Defendant 1, Anna Asfahany and JOHN DOES 1-20
Plaintiff:
Nabil Dweib Salem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
