Cases 1 - 10 of 16
ORJI v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv01004
Respondent:
JOHN DOE, MARTHA DOE, CATRICIA HOWARD and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. ORJI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AMIN v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv03418
Respondent:
JOHN DOE, JOSEPH WILMER and WILLIAM P. BARR
Petitioner:
ALI SHUKRI AMIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ELDRIDGE v. MOTLEY et al
as 1:2018cv01660
Respondent:
NANCY R. PAGE, JOHN DOES, THOMAS J. MOTLEY and others
Petitioner:
CLINTON T. ELDRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
CRAIG v. PEOPLE OF THE CITY, COUNTY OF DENVER et al
as 1:2017cv02414
Plaintiff:
BOBBY WOOD CRAIG
Defendant:
PEOPLE OF THE CITY, COUNTY OF DENVER, LOMBARDI, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
AL-HAWSAWI v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015cv01257
Petitioner:
MUSTAFA AHMED ADAM AL-HAWSAWI
Respondent:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II , ASHTON B. CARTER , JOSE R. MONTEAGUDO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GRIFFIN v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2011cv00756
Petitioner:
ERIC GRIFFIN
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KHAN et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00535
Petitioner:
JAN SHER KHAN and SHAH NAWAZ KHAN
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, ROBERT GATES and JOHN DOES NOS. 1 THROUGH 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SEITU v. PAN
as 1:2010cv00494
Plaintiff:
KWASI SEITU
Defendant:
FLORENCE PAN and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
AL-NAJAR et al v. GATES et al
as 1:2008cv02143
Petitioner:
REDHA AL-NAJAR and HOUCINE AL-NAJAR
Respondent:
ROBERT GATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AL BAKRI et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv01307
Petitioner:
AMIN AL BAKRI and MUHAMMAD AL BAKRI
Respondent:
GEORGE W. BUSH, ROBERT GATES, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
