Cases 31 - 40 of 173
Murray v. Menard, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00651
Plaintiff:
Anthony Murray
Defendant:
Menard, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Pearcy v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv11335
Plaintiff:
Richard Pearcy
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tatters v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
as 4:2022cv11330
Plaintiff:
Laurie J Tatters
Defendant:
Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America, LLC, f/k/a Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Holding USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perez v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv11265
Plaintiff:
Louis Perez
Defendant:
John Doe and DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Frelick v. 1156729 Ontario, Inc d/b/a CB Deliveries et al
as 2:2022cv11094
Plaintiff:
Timothy Frelick
Defendant:
1156729 Ontario, Inc d/b/a CB Deliveries and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Guinn v. DILLON et al
as 2:2022cv10172
Plaintiff:
Claybon Guinn
Defendant:
ROBERT EUGENE DILLON, United States of America, United States Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
DOE (1968-1990) v. University of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv10134
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE (1968-1990)
Defendant:
University of Michigan and Regents of the University of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Barksdale v. County of Macomb et al
as 4:2021cv12729
Plaintiff:
Shantanice Barksdale
Defendant:
County of Macomb, Michael Gorges, Amanda Backers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guinn v. DILLON et al
as 5:2021cv12542
Plaintiff:
Claybon Guinn
Defendant:
ROBERT EUGENE DILLON, United States of America, United States Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
