Cases 1 - 10 of 39
William Lewis Ross III v. Arrowhead Credit Union et al
as 5:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Ross, III
Defendant:
Arrowhead Credit Union and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Arthur G. Smith et al v. MAS Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
Arthur G Smith and Kerri M Smith
Defendant:
MAS Financial Services, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Dyer v. DOES 1-10
as 3:2023cv01226
Plaintiff:
Min Ji Goo Dyer
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lewis v. First National Bank of Omaha et al
as 4:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Cornelus E. Lewis
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Mathews v. Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02075
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Mathews
Defendant:
Health IQ Insurance Services, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brikman et al v. Yehoshua et al
as 3:2021mc80272
Plaintiff:
Mayer Chaim Brikman, Rivkah Brikman and Joseph B. Wolhendler
Defendant:
Hecht S. Yehoshua, John Does 1-10 and Jane Does 1-10
Petitioner:
Twitter Inc.
Parker v. United States Probation Office et al
as 3:2021cv01373
Plaintiff:
Derek Richard Parker
Defendant:
United States Probation Office, Mimi Manzano, Christopher J. Marco and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 fi
Barth v. Mabry Carlton Ranch, Inc et al
as 5:2020cv09288
Defendant:
Longino Ranch, Inc., Mabry Carlton Ranch, Inc, Eric Sutton and others
Plaintiff:
John S Barth and John Barth
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
