Cases 61 - 70 of 459
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FAUST v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
DANIL EZEKIEL FAUST and DANILO AUGUSTO FELICIANO
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and JOHN DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FAUST v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al.
as 1:2023cv00554
Plaintiff:
DANIL EZEKIEL FAUST and DANILO AUGUSTO FELICIANO
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and JOHN DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Carter Page v. James Comey, et al
as 23-5038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carter Page
Defendant / Appellee:
James B. Comey, Andrew McCabe, Kevin Clinesmith and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
