Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Matthews v. Bonner, et al
as 15-1011
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONOVAN CRAIG MATTHEWS
Respondent - Appellee:
BOBBY BONNER, Warden and JOHN SUTHERS, the Attorney General of the State of Colorado
In re: Pace, et al
as 14-1312
Respondent:
In re: TRAVIS TRANI, Warden and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Petitioner:
NED PACE, JR.
Garcia v. Lind, et al
as 14-1266
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN KEITH GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY LIND, Acting Warden of Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility, Colorado Department of Corrections and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Crownhart v. Suther
as 14-1114
Petitioner - Appellant:
EARL CROWNHART
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
In re: Stein
as 14-1020
Petitioner:
MICHAEL D. STEIN
Respondent:
RICK RAEMISCH and JOHN SUTHERS, the Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Johnson v. Medina, et al
as 13-1324
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LEE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden Fremont Correctional Facility and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Lucero v. Medina, et al
as 13-1300
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY LUCERO
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Hayes v. Falk, et al
as 13-1201
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE T. HAYES
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES FALK, D.O.C. Sterling Correctional Facility and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Rosales v. Milyard, et al
as 13-1183
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL L. ROSALES
Respondent - Appellee:
KEVIN MILYARD and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Stevenson v. Timme, et al
as 13-1147
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM R. STEVENSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RAE TIMME and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
