Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SAUCEDO et al v. J. FLETCHER CREAMER & SON, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00247
Defendant:
ALBINO OLIVEIRA, ROBERT CAMPOS, THERESA WARREN and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Alvarez, Marlon Hernandez, Gilberto Saucedo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
PARRINO v. SCHLAM et al
as 3:2015cv07674
Plaintiff:
GINA PARRINO
Defendant:
ELLIOT SCHLAM, NEW VISUAL MEDIA GROUP, LLC, JOHN AND JANE DOES (1-100) and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
FRISCH v. INSPERITY HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv00840
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FRISCH
Defendant:
INSPERITY HOLDINGS, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, ABC CORPORATION/ENTITIES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
COPELAND v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF NEW JERSEY, INC. et al
as 3:2013cv04787
Plaintiff:
HARRY COPELAND
Defendant:
FAMILY DOLLAR STORES OF NEW JERSEY, INC. , JOHN AND JANE DOES (1-100), ABC CORPS. (1-100) and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
PRO CARE INC. et al v. SMITH et al
as 2:2013cv03506
Plaintiff:
PRO CARE INC.
Defendant:
THOMAS SMITH , GUARD WELL MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION, LLC , PAVAN PATEL and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
THOMAS SMITH
Counter_defendant:
THOMAS SMITH
Counter_claimant:
PRO CARE INC.
Thirdparty_defendant:
ANDRE OZERYANSKY, POLINA OZERYANSKY and STEVEN WEISSBLUM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CHARLES v. VERIZON et al
as 3:2009cv05594
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE D. CHARLES
Defendant:
VERIZON, VERIZON LIVESOURCE, XYZ, CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ZAHL, M.D. et al v. UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2009cv01321
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ZAHL, M.D. and KENNETH ZAHL, M.D.
Defendant:
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE OF NJ, UNITED HEALTHCARE OF NY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
