Cases 1 - 10 of 20
GARRETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79827
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY GARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garrett v. State of Illinois
as 6:2020cv00518
Respondent:
State of Illinois
Petitioner:
Johnny Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garrett v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2020cv00479
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Johnnie Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garrett et al v. People of Illinois State et al
as 6:2020cv00373
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Garrett and China Anne McClain
Defendant:
Illinois, Attorney General, Warden or Sheriff, Centralia or I.D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRETT v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03262
Plaintiff:
BRENT BERGENER, JIBRIEL STARKS, MICHAEL JACQUES and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garrett et al v. People of the State of Illinois
as 8:2017cv01714
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Garrett and China Anne McClain
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett et al v. Diaz
as 5:2017cv00292
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Garrett and China Anne McClain
Defendant:
Ro Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain et al v. Pinckneyville Segregation et al
as 2:2017cv00319
Plaintiff:
China Anne McClain, Johnnie Garrett and Sienna McClain
Defendant:
Pinckneyville Segregation, Personal Property, Offender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett et al v. People of State of Illinois
as 6:2017cv00265
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Garrett and China Anne McClain
Defendant:
People of State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. State of Illinois
as 6:2017cv00266
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Garrett
Defendant:
State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
