Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv06147
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv06146
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv06075
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv06044
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv06258
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv06214
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2014cv06324
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Catlin v. Cherry Creek Strategic Advisors, LLC
as 6:2014cv06163
Plaintiff: Jonathan Paul Catlin
Defendant: Cherry Creek Strategic Advisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06394
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jonathan Catlin v. City of Wheaton, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-3903
Plaintiff - Appellant: JONATHAN A. CATLIN
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF WHEATON, a municipal corporation of the State of Illinois, MARK FIELD, individually and as officer, employee and agent of the City of Wheaton and BILL COOLEY, individually and as officer, employee and agent of the City of Wheaton
Defendant: CITY OF WHEATON POLICE DEPARTMENT and DUPAGE COUNTY MAJOR CRIMES TASK FORCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?