Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jose Morales v. R. Torres, et al
as 21-15029
Defendant / Appellee:
GAMBOA, ALVARADO-TORRES and R. TORRES
Defendant:
JONATHAN E. AKANNO, LAMBERT, DAVE DAVEY, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE LORENZO MORALES
Morales v. Davey et al
as 1:2017cv01673
Plaintiff:
Jose Lorenzo Morales
Defendant:
Dave Davey, J. Gallagher, R. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Blanco v. Gregory Duncan, et al
as 17-55968
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BLANCO
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY J. DUNCAN, Primary Care Physician, BARBARA FELLOWS, Registered Nurse, CHERYL MALO-CLINES, Primary Care Physician and others
Christopher Simmons v. S. Zamora, et al
as 17-15658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ISAAC SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. ZAMORA, DOE, Chief Medical Office Doe, ROBERT KELDGORD and others
Sammy Zamaro v. R. Moonga, et al
as 14-15518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMMY ZAMARO
Defendant - Appellee:
R. MOONGA and JONATHAN E. AKANNO, MD
Sims v. Lopez et al
as 1:2010cv01409
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Sims
Defendant:
Sherry Lopez, Kelly Harrington, J. Clark Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. USA, et al
as 1:2002cv05801
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jesse Walker
Defendant:
Taft Correctional Institution , - Andrews , Jonathan E Akanno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Zamaro v. Moonga et al
as 2:2009cv00421
Plaintiff:
Sammy Zamaro
Defendant:
G. Moonga, Jonathan E Akanno, Bedi and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Zamaro v. Moonga et al
as 1:2009cv00580
Plaintiff:
Sammy Zamaro
Defendant:
G. Moonga, Jonathan E Akanno, Bedi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pollard v. Wackenhut
as 07-16112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LEE POLLARD
Defendant - Appellee:
WACKENHUT, dba Taft Correctional Institution, MARGARET MINNECI, JONATHAN E. AKANNO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
