Cases 11 - 20 of 43
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67540
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28312
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Blair
as 1:2021cv00388
Defendant:
Chelsea Blair
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Smith
Cross Claimant:
Government Employee Insurance Company (GEICO)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. Jett et al
as 3:2020cv01376
Defendant:
Det. Jonathan Smith and Deputy Cody Jett
Plaintiff:
Colburn Clifton Gooden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05574
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03844
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03491
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv00782
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv61220
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54695
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
