Cases 1 - 10 of 21
GS Holistic, LLC v. Sky Vapor Inc et al
as 2:2023cv05627
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Sky Vapor Inc doing business as Smiley's Smoke & Vape Shop, Michael Kohanoff and Joshua M Khorsandi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Joshua M. Barkan v. Conversion Interactive Agency
as 5:2021cv00262
Plaintiff:
Joshua M. Barkan
Defendant:
Conversion Interactive Agency
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Williams v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv08634
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua M Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joshua M. Barkan v. HUB Group, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00643
Defendant:
HUB Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joshua M. Barkan
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Joshua Jackson v. John McMahon et al
as 5:2019cv00548
Defendant:
John-Jane Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv07729
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
R. Bowman et al v. Burnt Ends, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05782
Plaintiff:
R Bowman and D Mousseau
Defendant:
Burnt Ends, LLC, DOE, Joshua M. Fine and others
Amber Jones et al v. City of Rialto
as 5:2017cv01514
Plaintiff:
David Hernandez, Joseph Brown, Shaun R Mooney and others
Petitioner:
Carl Jones
Defendant:
City of Rialto
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nelman-Thomas v. People of the State of California, County of Mendocino
as 4:2016cv06572
Petitioner:
Joshua M. Nelman-Thomas
Respondent:
People of the State of California, County of Mendocino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ets-Hokin v. Volkswagen AG et al
as 3:2015cv04582
Defendant:
Volkswagen AG, Audi AG, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua M. Ets-Hokin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
