Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Boyd v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2013cv13474
Plaintiff:
Danny G. Boyd
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Robinett v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv12765
Plaintiff:
Teresa Robinett
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC , The Bank of New York Melon and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Burley et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2013cv00477
Plaintiff:
Steven Burley and Michelle Burley
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bartolomeo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2013cv11616
Plaintiff:
Dawn Bartolomeo
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Bruck v. J.P. Morgan Chas Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv14941
Plaintiff:
Craig A. Bruck and Anjell K. Karibian
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The Fedral Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Ranelli v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv13626
Plaintiff:
Louis Ranelli
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. , JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grippi v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv12260
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe Grippi
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , US Bank, NA, N.D., Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bernard v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv11240
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Bernard
Defendant:
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation and JP Morgan Chase Bank (N.A.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cervi v. JP Morgan Chase Bank (N.A.)
as 2:2011cv11499
Plaintiff:
Mona Cervi
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank (N.A.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mellentine et al v. Ameriquest Mortgage Company et al
as 2:2011cv11358
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mellentine and Debra Mellentine
Defendant:
Ameriquest Mortgage Company , WM Specialty Mortgage LLC , Citi Residential Lending, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
