Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Piguet v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association et al
as 0:2013cv62406
Plaintiff:
Christine A. Piguet
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association and Corelogic
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441
Piguet v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 0:2013cv62386
Plaintiff:
Christine A. Piguet
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association and Corelogic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kittle v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 4:2013cv01952
Plaintiff:
Gary Kittle
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reeeves v. Torres et al
as 2:2013cv00708
Plaintiff:
Cleveland J. Reeves
Defendant:
Gabriel Torres and JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hippe v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2013cv01507
Plaintiff:
Theresa J. Hippe
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Buresh v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 8:2013cv01195
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Buresh
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. , JP Morgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America, N.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Kaine et al v. Chase Home Finance, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2012cv04483
Plaintiff:
Dale R. Kaine , Stacie Sikes-Day and David Hartman
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, L.L.C. , Chase Home Finance, Inc. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Supreme Construction Corp. v. Safeco Surplus Lines Insurance Company et al
as 0:2012cv62364
Plaintiff:
Supreme Construction Corp.
Defendant:
Safeco Surplus Lines Insurance Company and JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Organek v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2012cv23949
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Organek
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Herrick et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv22256
Plaintiff:
Alfred Herrick and Sydell Herrick
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Chase Insurance Agency, Inc. and Voyager Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
