Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Akib Abiola v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., et al
as 23-1006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AKIB ABIOLA
Defendant / Appellee:
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Abiola v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv13741
Plaintiff:
Akib Abiola
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. , DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buck v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2017cv11151
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Becky Jo Buck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Mowett v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 16-1485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MOWETT
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Joe Thomas, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 16-1068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE THOMAS and BERNICE THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Garrow v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2015cv14058
Plaintiff:
Tara Garrow
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valerie McKinstry-Austin v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, et al
as 15-2240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VALERIE MCKINSTRY-AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and COUNTRY HOME MORTGAGE, INC.
McConnell et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2015cv12794
Plaintiff:
Michael A. McConnell and Sabrina M. McConnell
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mowett v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 2:2015cv12612
Plaintiff:
David Mowett
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilkerson v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al
as 4:2015cv11667
Plaintiff:
Theresa Wilkerson
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, and Mawad S. Khalil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
