Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Laydell Wyatt v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 15-1555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAYDELL WYATT
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
TROTT & TROTT, PC
Miles v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2015cv11376
Plaintiff:
Alex Miles
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Howard Fisher, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 15-1373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD P. FISHER and NANCY A. FISHER
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Rafah Dawood v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, et al
as 15-1242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAFAH DAWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and FIFTH THIRD BANK, N.A.
Rafah Dawood v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, et al
as 15-1242
Defendant / Appellee:
FIFTH THIRD BANK, N.A. and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAFAH DAWOOD
Boluch et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv14705
Plaintiff:
Kirk Boluch and Rita Boluch
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sand v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2014cv01155
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Sand
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Bank of America , Prolending Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Fisher et al v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al
as 2:2014cv12734
Plaintiff:
Howard P Fisher and Nancy A Fisher
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Pratt v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 14-1830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. PRATT
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Dawood v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, et al
as 2:2014cv12442
Plaintiff:
Rafah Dawood
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, and Fifth Third Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
