Cases 21 - 30 of 50
TINSLEY v. IAM SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT INC., ET AL
as 1:2017cv02780
Defendant:
ERIKA BLUME, RAYMOND BROTHERS, JENNIFER BURR and others
Plaintiff:
JAMAAL L. TINSLEY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01493
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
LEE v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 4:2017cv00082
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01303
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00361
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SCARR v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al.
as 1:2016cv02605
Defendant:
JULIAN CASTRO, FEIWELL AND HANNOY PC, CAROL J. GALANTE and others
Plaintiff:
KIMBALL RUSTIN ROY SCARR
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT
Defendant:
JACKSON, JAMIE GREGORY, EK PROPERTIES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
MATHUR v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 1:2016cv00387
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
KIRAN MATHUR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
