Cases 21 - 30 of 266
Doe 1 v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 1:2022cv10019
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Not Classified By Court:
Jordana H. Feldman, Epstein Victims Compensation Program and Bradley J. Edwards
3Rd Party Defendant:
James Edward Staley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Doe 1 v. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 1:2022cv10018
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Government of the United States Virgin Islands
Consolidated Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Not Classified By Court:
Epstein Victims Compensation Program and Jordana H. Feldman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Amcore Bank, N.A., et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 1:2014cv01757
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Markets Ltd., Portigon AG, Bank of America Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, The Berkshire Bank, Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Vladimir Sklarov
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
BBA Trent Ltd. (F.K.A. BBA LIBOR, Ltd.), NatWest Markets plc (F.K.A. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc), COPERATIEVE RABOBANK UA (F.K.A. COPERATIEVE CENTRALE RAIFFEISEN-BOERENLEENBANK, B.A.) and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 FDIC: Corporate Powers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv03115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
State of New York ex rel. Ken Elder v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv03130
Plaintiff:
State of New York ex rel. Ken Elder
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Dennis et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2016cv06496
Plaintiff:
Dennis, FrontPoint Asian Event Driven Fund, L.P., Sonterra Capital Master Fund, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Australia, BNP Paribas, Australia Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Demaretz-Ryan v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2023cv02451
Plaintiff:
Nicole Demaretz-Ryan
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Fund Transfer Act
In re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013cv07789
Not Classified By Court:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Keith Kornell, Gregory Galan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Nasser Bakizada, Robert Charles Class A, L.P., Jeffrey Sterk and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Citibank N.A., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Credit Suisse Group AP and others
Defendant:
Settling Defendants, Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Donna S. Lucas, Neil Taylor, Doris Sue Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Rives, Robert Miller, Casey Sterk and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC North America Holdings, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Fresno County Employees Retirement Association
Consolidated Counter Defendant:
BNP Paribas North America, Inc.
Claimant:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD), Forex Capital Markets, LLC, Lucid Markets LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 la Removal - Truth in Lending Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
