Cases 21 - 30 of 39
SCHUSTAL v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 3:2020cv00439
Plaintiff:
YAAKOV SCHUSTAL
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 22
ROSENTHAL v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 3:2020cv00419
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
YISRAEL ROSENTHAL
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251
PASKESZ v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 3:2019cv18384
Plaintiff:
CHAIM PASKESZ
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE & COMPANY and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., v. CMA TRADING, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00130
Defendant:
Gunther Eben, CMA Trading, Inc. and Hong Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
HILLSBOROUGH TITLE, INC. v. SAMORA CONSTRUCTION LLC et al
as 2:2018mc00222
Plaintiff:
HILLSBOROUGH TITLE, INC.
Defendant:
SAMORA CONSTRUCTION LLC, PEARL & SAMORA LLC, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv11462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. v. NEU et al
as 2:2017cv03475
Cross Claimant:
RIVER PARK BUSINESS CENTER INC., RICHARD W. NEU TRUST NO. 2, RICHARD W. NEU ISSUE TRUST and others
Defendant:
MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL TRADING CORPORATION, CROSSROADS BUSINESS CENTER, LLC, RIVER PARK BUSINESS CENTER LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
EDEN WOOD REALTY, LLC, RICHARD W. NEU, AMY NEU and others
Plaintiff:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv07948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv03677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv04107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
