Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kay v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01440
Plaintiff:
Susan Kay
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 e Preauthorized transfers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00069
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Lioy-Ryan et al v. Ron Tonkin Dodge et al
as 3:2014cv01343
Defendant:
Bank of the West, A California Corporation, Capital One NA, Gateway One Lending & Finance LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lioy-Ryan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kelly v. Abel et al
as 3:2011cv01178
Defendant:
Gregory E. Abel, Wedge Abels, Shane E. Abma and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Van Alstine et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2011cv00930
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage LLC, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Arthur G. Van Alstine and Janice R. Van Alstine
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01465
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Morton v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2010cv03082
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Gary Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. $31,215.17 in Funds Seized From JP Morgan Bank
as 3:2010mc09119
Defendant:
$31,215.17 in Funds Seized From JP Morgan Bank
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
