Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rosario-Gonzalez, et al v. Cooperativa de Seguros, et al
as 13-2066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROSARIO-GONZALEZ and JUAN VELEZ-PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERTO CASTRO-HIRALGO, LISA M. LOPEZ-SMITH, GERARDO ORTIZ and others
Rosario-Gonzalez, et al v. Cooperativa de Seguros, et al
as 13-2062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROSARIO-GONZALEZ and JUAN VELEZ-PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
SEGUROS MULTIPLES, ROBERTO CASTRO-HIRALGO, GERARDO ORTIZ and others
Rosario-Gonzalez et al v. Seguros Multiples et al
as 3:2013cv01079
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rosario-Gonzalez and Juan Velez-Padilla
Defendant:
Seguros Multiples, Roberto Castro-Hiralgo, Gerardo Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Rosario-Gonzalez, et al v. US, et al
as 12-2343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROSARIO-GONZALEZ and JUAN VELEZ-PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, SERVICIOS DE SALUD EN EL HOGAR Y HOSPICIO SAN LUCAS, INC. and CLINICAL MEDICAL SERVICES FOR VA
Defendant:
VAMC and US DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Regional Office
Rosario-Gonzalez, et al v. US, et al
as 12-2342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROSARIO-GONZALEZ and JUAN VELEZ-PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, SERVICIOS DE SALUD EN EL HOGAR Y HOSPICIO SAN LUCAS, INC. and CLINICAL MEDICAL SERVICES FOR VA
Defendant:
VAMC and US DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Regional Office
Rosario-Gonzalez, et al v. US, et al
as 10-2062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROSARIO-GONZALEZ and JUAN VELEZ-PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, VAMC, DEPARTMENT OF VETERNS AFFAIRS, Regional Office and others
Rosario-Gonzalez et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2009cv02200
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rosario-Gonzalez and Juan Velez-Padilla
Defendant:
United States of America, VAMC San Juan, Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
