Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 751
Langworthy v. Clallam County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 24-2976
Plaintiff: GENEVA LANGWORTHY
Defendant: CLALLAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ALEX SCHODOWSKI, Clallam County District Court Judge and Pro Tem Judge, DAVE NEUPERT, Clallam County District Court Judge and Pro Tem Judge and others
Bondurant v. Kubota
as 24-2806
Plaintiff: NANCY R. BONDURANT
Defendant: PETER KENJI KUBOTA, Individually and Acting in His Official Capacity as Judge of the Third Circuit Court, Hilo, Hawaii
Rasmussen v. Powell, et al.
as 24-2321
Plaintiff: JOHN DENNIS RASMUSSEN
Defendant: DEBRA POWELL, PETER M. GRABIEL, JOLIE A. RUSSO, MAGISTRATE JUDGE and others
Turner v. Rogers
as 24-2273
Plaintiff: ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant: YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, DISTRICT JUDGE, US District Court Judge
Sivak v. Fletcher, et al.
as 24-2242
Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK
Defendant: WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE and MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Paez
as 24-2243
Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK
Defendant: RICHARD A. PAEZ, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff: LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Raiser v. Gelmis, et al.
as 24-2163
Plaintiff: AARON RAISER
Defendant: SUSAN GELMIS, ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Boersma v. Armstrong
as 24-2090
Plaintiff: HEATHER LYNN BOERSMA
Defendant: SEAN ARMSTRONG, Marion County Circuit Court Judge
Smith v. Superior Court of California County of Alameda et al
as 3:2024cv01981
Plaintiff: Andrea Smith
Defendant: Superior Court of California County of Alameda, People of the State of California, Judge Stuart Hing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?