Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Akeem Muhammad v. Julia Jones, et al
as 22-10801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AKEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant / Appellee:
JULIA JONES, Individually, M.D. OLUGBENGA OGUNSANWO, Individually as former director of Medical and Mental Health Services for the Fla. Dept. of Corr., THOMAS REIMERS, Individually and officially as Director of Health Services for the Fla. Dept. of Corr. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Hardin v. Inch et al
as 3:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hardin
Defendant:
Mark Inch and Julia Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. State of Colorado
as 1:2021cv00654
Plaintiff:
William Brian Cook
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Emily Briggs, Joe Pella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv01290
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Julia Jones
Petitioner:
Elijualwon Israel Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. State of Florida
as 5:2019cv00431
Defendant:
State of Florida, Julia Jones, H. George and others
Plaintiff:
George L Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORTH v. JONES
as 1:2018cv00099
Petitioner:
RAYMOND JUNIOR NORTH
Respondent:
JULIA JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hayes v. Delgado et al
as 2:2018cv00341
Plaintiff:
Reginald Hayes
Defendant:
J. Delgado, Carmello Berrious, D. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUGH v. JONES
as 5:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
D'ANGELO J PUGH
Defendant:
JULIA JONES and NOEL A MERCER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEVRAS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2018cv00542
Plaintiff:
JAMES PAUL ALEVRAS
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, JULIA JONES, MEDICAL PROVIDER CENTURION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tommy McGuire v. Julia Jones, et al
as 17-56908
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOMMY R. MCGUIRE
Respondent - Appellee:
JULIA JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
