Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Harper v. Rudek, et al
as 15-6088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC and others
Harper v. Rudek, et al
as 15-6033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, CARL BEAR, Warden's Assistant and others
Cleveland v. Harvanek, et al
as 14-7089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CLEVELAND
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMERON HARVANEK, Warden, DOUG BYRD, Warden, SUSAN WELCHER, Mailroom and others
Green v. Jone
as 14-6192
Petitioner - Appellant:
BOBBY GREEN
Respondent - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC
Berryhill v. LaGrange, et al
as 14-6156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
VICKI MILES LAGRANGE, U.S. District Judge, LEE R. WEST, District Director, U.S. District Judge, ROBIN CAUTHRON, District Director, U.S. District Judge and others
Berryhill v. OK DOC Board Members, et al
as 14-6155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS BOARD MEMBERS, DIRECTOR OF DENTISTRY, MARTY SIRMONS, Warden and others
Cleveland v. Martin, et al
as 14-5060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CLEVELAND
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY MARTIN, Warden, MAURICE WARRIOR, Deputy Warden, GLENN WALDON, Unit Manager and others
Williams v. Jones, et al
as 14-7038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, TIM WILKINSON, Warden and BRIAN WIDEMAN, Chaplain
McMiller v. Jones, et al
as 14-6103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HENRY MCMILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, TRACY MCCOLLUM, Warden, FNU BORNHEIM and others
Dopp v. Jones, et al
as 14-6025
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD LYNN DOPP
Respondent - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC and RANDALL WORKMAN, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
