Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Ja-Ron Teague v. LaDonna Thompson, et al
as 10-5625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
LADONNA H. THOMPSON, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, ROBERT HUBER, Jailer, Simpson County Jail, GERALD BESHEAR and others
Teague v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00215
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, LaDonna Thompson, Marion County Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teague v. Thompson et al
as 3:2010cv00205
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, Jeff Burton, Barry Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teague et al v. Thompson et al
as 3:2010cv00153
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague, Terrance Johnson and Darrie Rushin
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, Robert Huber, Gerald Beshear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al v. Ja-Ron Teague
as 09-6295
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY and DONALD E. ARMSTRONG, JR.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
KY v. Ja-Ron Teague
as 09-6172
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Defendant - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
USA v. Ja-Ron Teague
as 09-6133
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Teague v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2009cv00749
Petitioner:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Teague v. Bolton
as 3:2009cv00748
Petitioner:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Respondent:
Mark Bolton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Teague v. Bolton et al
as 3:2009cv00747
Petitioner:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Respondent:
Mark Bolton and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
