Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Donald Trump v. Bennie Thompson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-5254
Plaintiff / Appellant: Donald J. Trump, in his capacity as the 45th President of the United States
Defendant / Appellee: Bennie G. Thompson, in his official capacity as Chairman of the United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, David Ferriero, in his official capacity as Archivist of the United States, National Archives and Records Administration, United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack On The United States Capitol and others
Amicus Curiae: Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Virginia Canter, Richard Painter and others
Phillip Brewer v. Nagel, et al
as 19-5906
Defendant / Appellee: JACK CONWAY, TIMOTHY P. RYAN, MAJOR NAGEL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: PHILLIP BREWER
Chiropractors United, et al v. Jack Conway, et al
as 15-6103
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHIROPRACTORS UNITED FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION, LLC, aka CURE, COMMERCE CHIROPRACTIC AND REHAB, PSC, LOUISVILLE SPORTS AND INJURY CHIROPRACTIC & REHAB CENTER and others
Defendant - Appellee: JACK CONWAY, KENTUCKY BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS, MARK R. WOODWARD and others
Chiropractors United For Research and Education, LLC et al v. Conway et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00556
Plaintiff: Chiropractors United For Research and Education, LLC , Commerce Chiropractic and Rehab, PSC , Louisville Sports and Injury Chiropractic & Rehab Center and others
Defendant: Jack Conway , Kentucky Board of Chiropractic Examiners , Mark R. Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Google Inc. v. Hood We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00981
Plaintiff: Google Inc.
Defendant: Jim Hood, Digital Citizens Alliance, Taylor Hooton Foundation and others
Interested Party: Gina Morris
Amicus Curiae: International AntiCounterfeiting Coalition, Attorney General Jack Conway, Electronic Frontier Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of Missouri, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-17111
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. Chris Koster, Attorney General, STATE OF NEBRASKA, ex rel. Jon Bruning, Attorney General, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel. E. Scott Pruitt, Attorney General and others
Defendant - Appellee: KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and KAREN ROSS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA EGG FARMERS
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF UTAH, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
John Russell, et al v. Allison Lundergan-Grimes, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-6262
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN RUSSELL and CAMPBELL COUNTY AUTO BODY, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: ALLISON LUNDERGAN-GRIMES, Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, DAVID CROSS, Member State Board of Elections, JOHN HAMPTON, Member State Board of Elections and others
Defendant: JACK SNODGRASS, Member of the Campbell County Board of Elections, et al.
In re: Eric Hermansen
as 14-6038
Movant: In re: ERIC LLOYD HERMANSEN
Respondent: RANDY WHITE, Warden, KENTUCKY STATE PENITENTIARY and JACK CONWAY, Attorney General of Kentucky
Franklin et al v. Breshear et al
as 3:2013cv00946
Plaintiff: Kimberly Franklin and Tamera Boyd
Defendant: Steve Breshear , Jack Conway and Sue Carol Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Franklin et al v. Breshear et al
as 3:2013cv00051
Plaintiff: Kimberly Franklin and Tamera Boyd
Defendant: Steve Breshear, Jack Conway and Sue Carol Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?