Cases 1 - 10 of 848
Charles Turpin, et al v. DC, et al
as 24-7064
Plaintiff:
Charles Turpin and Regina Jackson
Defendant:
District of Columbia, a municipal corporation and Michael Chen, Officer, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DANTZLER v. JORDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant:
WILLIAM WILL JORDEN, DOUGLAS WELBORN, ALVIN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aror-ark O'diah v. John Roberts, et al
as 24-5074
Plaintiff:
Aror-ark Ark O'diah
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, United States Small Business Administration, also known as United States Small Business Administration, SBA, Isabella Casillas Guzman, SBA Administrator and others
JACKSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
MELVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
Abdul Mohammed v. Frank Easterbrook, et al
as 23-5293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdul Azeem Mohammed
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Easterbrook, Hon., Vanita Gupta, Merrick B. Garland and others
ANDALUSIA HEALTH et al v. XAVIER BECERRA
as 1:2023cv03527
Plaintiff:
ANDALUSIA HEALTH, CENTURA ST. CATHERINE HOSPITAL DODGE CITY, HAVASU REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Not Classified By Court:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
JACKSON v. WORMUTH
as 1:2023cv03684
Plaintiff:
STEVEN M JACKSON and STEVEN M. JACKSON
Defendant:
CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
