Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Gary v. Airmar et al
as 8:2013cv00520
Plaintiff:
Carlton Gary
Defendant:
Airmar, Cisco, Polk Medical Institutition and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYONS v. JACKSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 5:2011cv00286
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LYONS
Defendant:
JACKSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, SHELINA PETERSON, JESSICA VALVERDE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KUHNE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2011cv00209
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY KUHNE
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , LYSETTE LAGARES , OLIVIA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYONS v. JACKSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 5:2010cv00298
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LYONS
Defendant:
JACKSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCFARLANE v. JACKSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 5:2010cv00223
Plaintiff:
MILTON EARL MCFARLANE
Defendant:
JACKSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schuenke v. Wisconsin Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00441
Plaintiff:
Lloyd T. Schuenke
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department Of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUSTELIER v. JACKSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 5:2009cv00210
Petitioner:
SALVADOR F MUSTELIER
Respondent:
JACKSON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEAL v. CHATTAHOOCHEE STATE MENTAL HEALTH HOSPITAL
as 4:2009cv00011
Plaintiff:
ERVIN NEAL
Defendant:
CHATTAHOOCHEE STATE MENTAL HEALTH HOSPITAL, OKALOSSA COUNTY JAIL, LAKE BUTLER R M C and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WATERS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2007cv00163
Plaintiff:
LEONARD WINDELL WATERS
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
