Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Bennett v. Hinthorne
as 3:2023cv03095
Plaintiff:
Chad Bennett
Defendant:
Jacksonville Correctional Center and Cherryle Hynthorne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillette v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03098
Plaintiff:
Bradley Gillette
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavette v. Hinthorne
as 3:2023cv03097
Plaintiff:
Justin Cavette
Defendant:
Jacksonville Correctional Center and Cherryle Hinthorne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petro v. Hinthorne
as 3:2023cv03091
Plaintiff:
Caden Petro
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Hinthorne
as 3:2023cv03088
Plaintiff:
Jose Miller
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Temple v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03087
Plaintiff:
Jason Temple
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edsall v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03089
Plaintiff:
Jacob Edsall
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bright v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03092
Plaintiff:
Spencer Bright
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortega v. Hinthorne
as 3:2023cv03093
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ortega
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearce v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03086
Plaintiff:
Lee Pearce
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
