Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Austin v. Land Title Guarantee Company et al
as 1:2020cv03462
Defendant:
Ladell D Grizzell, Frenchie Lee Lacy Sr., Edward Kovitz and others
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Austin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Austin v. Land Title Guarantee Company et al
as 1:2020cv00664
Defendant:
Land Title Guarantee Company, John Stewart Robinson, LoanDepot Wholesale and others
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Austin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Hadley et al v. Home Bridge Financial services et al
as 1:2019cv00866
Defendant:
Corporate Headquarters, Home Bridge Financial services and Home Bridge
Plaintiff:
Donna L. Hadley and Jamal Hadley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Saied Jamal Trading, Ltd. v. Bank Of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2019cv03442
Defendant:
Bank Of America, N.A. and Denice Crosby individually doing business as DC Compliance
Plaintiff:
DC Compliance, Denice Crosby and SAIED JAMAL TRADING, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
SWEIGERT et al v. PODESTA et al
as 1:2017cv02330
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WEBB SWEIGERT, JOHN DOES and JANE DOES
Defendant:
JOHN PODESTA, KIM FRITTS , GLEN SIMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
SWEIGERT et al v. PEREZ et al
as 1:2017cv02223
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WEBB SWEIGERT, JOHN DOES 1 TO 435 and JANE DOES 1 TO 435
Defendant:
TOM PEREZ , DNC SERVICES CORPORATION , DEBORAH WASSERMAN-SCHULTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Ali v. Jawad et al
as 1:2016cv00879
Plaintiff:
Hussein Ali
Defendant:
Nadya Jawad, Fawzi Sood, Jamal Taha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bill Jamal v. Maria Gonzalez et al
as 2:2015cv07966
Defendant:
Does, Edith Gonzalez and Maria Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
Bill Jamal
Bannerman et al v. Exclusive Motors Group Corp. et al
as 0:2013cv62425
Plaintiff:
Alexis D. Bannerman and Jamal B. Barr
Defendant:
Exclusive Motors Group Corp. and John Does #1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
